Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Maneklal Bhansali Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA 1773/Mum/2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/01/2025
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Vijay Maneklal Bhansali Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Sections 147/148 remain applicable if AO opts not to invoke Section 153C:   ITAT Mumbai upholds addition under Section 68 of ₹4.89 Cr.

The case of Vijay Maneklal Bhansali vs. ITO revolves around the reassessment under Sections 147/148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the addition of ₹4.89 crore under Section 68. The appellant, Vijay Maneklal Bhansali, challenged the reassessment order citing procedural and jurisdictional lapses by the Assessing Officer (AO). The ITAT Mumbai addressed the leg

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Once repayment is established, Section 68 additions unwarranted: ITAT Jaipur Advance Tax Calculation and Payment: A Simple Guide Property attachments & garnishee proceedings: Kerala HC directs expedited appeal disposal Kerala HC Directs IT Dept to Expedite 8-Year-Old Appeal Bombay HC Directs Income Tax Dept to Review Seized Gold Case View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31