Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jenendra Kumar Jain Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 415/Hyd/2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/12/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2016-2017
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jenendra Kumar Jain Vs Income Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)

ITAT Hyderabad held that mere securing a house on rent in the USA is not the conclusive fact that the assessee had become a USA resident to allow DTAA benefit.

Facts- Assessee is an individual. During the assessment year 2016-17, he was employed with Amazon Development Centre (India) Pvt. Ltd (Amazon India) between 1/4/2015 and 17/10/2015, and was subsequently transferred to Amazon Corporate LLC (Amazon USA) from 20/10/2015.

It is an undisputed fact that the assessee resided in India for more than 183 days during the financial year 2015-16 and, therefore, he qualifies to be a Resident and Ordinarily Resident (ROR) in India for the assessment year 2016-17.

Assessee filed the return of income for the assessment year 201617 but did not include his income between the period 17/10/2015 and 31/3/2016 the period during which the assessee was under the employment with Amazon USA. Assessee stated that he was qualified to be a resident of two countries for the period 17/10/2015 and 31/3/2016, he is entitled to avail the benefit under the Income Tax Act, 1961 or India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031