Case Law Details
Case Name : Ramesh Chander Nijhawan Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Courts :
All ITAT ITAT Delhi
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ramesh Chander Nijhawan Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
The AO disallowed the deduction u/s 54F on the grounds that the capital gain account has been closed without the approval of the Assessing Officer and thus failed to satisfy the mandatory requirement of closing the account with due approval of the AO. The ld. CIT(A) concurred with the observation of the ld. CIT(A).
It is not in dispute that an amount of Rs.40,00,000/- has been invested in the specified bonds, in this case REC Bonds and purchased house for Rs.82,50,000/-. Hence, the observation of ld. CIT(A) that the assessee is not eligible for clai...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

