Case Law Details
Midland Microfin Ltd. Vs Union of India and others (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Whether at this stage of notice under Section 148, writ Court should venture into the merits of the controversy when AO is yet to frame assessment/reassemment in discharge of statutory duty casted upon him under Section 147 of the Act
Admittedly in the present case the procedure as contemplated of the 1961 Act was followed and the authority acted within jurisdiction though petitioner alleges that it erred as the petitioner claims that the order passed under section 148A (d) warrants interference owing to error of fact.
Keeping in view that aforesaid facts and the settled proposition of law, we find no reason to interfere at this stage.
FULL TEXT OF THE JUDGMENT/ORDER OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.