Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Twinkle Enviro Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1229/Mum/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Twinkle Enviro Tech Pvt. Ltd. Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

At the outset, we find that assessee’s case has been referred to Hon’ble National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) for Insolvency Resolution Process and an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) has been appointed in the assessee company. In view of the order passed by the Hon’ble NCLT, we are of the considered view that since the proceedings under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) have already been initiated and moratorium has been declared for prohibiting all the proceedings against the corporate debtor including execution of any judgement, decree or order in any Court of law, Tribunal, Arbitration Panel or other authority, present appeals in the present format are not maintainable, being not filed by Mr. Devendra Jain, Interim Resolution Professional who is empowered to file appeal only on approval of the committee of the creditors. Hence, both the appeals (the assessee as well as the Revenue) are liable to be dismissed being not maintainable at this stage. We find that the ld. IRP had not impleaded himself in the instant case before us by filing a revised Form No.36. The Form No.36 available in our record is the one signed by the erstwhile Director of the assessee company. As per Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, no proceedings shall remain pending with any Court or Tribunal, once the Insolvency Resolution Proceedings had been initiated on a Corporate Debtor. It is not in dispute that the assessee company is a Corporate Debtor. Similarly, the Revenue has also not filed Revised Form No.36 by impleading the IRP in the instant case.

In view of the above, we deem it fit and appropriate to dismiss the appeal of the assessee as well as the revenue as not maintainable with a liberty given to ld. IRP and Revenue to prefer Miscellaneous Application, if so desired, after the completion of Insolvency Resolution Process, in which event, these appeals shall be restored.

ITA No.1231/Mum/2018 (A.Y.2014-15) Assessee appeal

This appeal in ITA No.1231/Mum/2018 for A.Y.2014-15 arises out of the order by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-48, Mumbai in appeal No.CIT(A)-48/IT-228/DCCC-2(4)/2016-17 dated 24/01/2017 (ld. CIT(A) in short) against the order of assessment passed u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as Act) dated 26/12/2016 by the ld. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as ld. AO).

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031