This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 56(2)(vii) cannot be invoked if no difference between agreement & Stamp Duty Value
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. Selvi Chittiraja Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2014-15
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Chennai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Smt. Selvi Chittiraja Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
The next issue that came up for our consideration is additions of Rs.28,40,000/- made u/s.56(2)(vii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The facts with regard to impugned dispute are that the assessee has purchased property by entering into sale agreement on 25.07.2012 and paid advance amounting to Rs.7,50,000/- by cheque bearing no.874436 dated 25.07.2012 drawn on Indian Bank in favour of seller. The property has been registered in favour of the assessee on 02.04.2013. At the time of registration of sale deed, guideline value of the property was more than ...
