Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anju Kalsi Vs HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited and Another (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Civil Appeal Nos 1544-1545 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (C) Nos 32397-32398 of 2017)
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/02/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Anju Kalsi Vs HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Limited and Another (Supreme Court of India)

It is duty of insurance company to communicate details of terms and conditions of insurance policy to the beneficiaries of insurance.

BRIEF FACTS

1. These appeals arise from a judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission1 dated 24 March 2017 in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction against an order of the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission2 , Chandigarh.

2. On 3 September 2013, the appellant’s son obtained the benefit of an insurance cover under a policy called the “Cardsure Package Policy”. The appellant’s son was an account holder with HDFC Bank Limited and had availed of a debit card from the bank. The bank, which is the second respondent, obtained an insurance cover on 3 September 2013 from the first respondent.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Qualified Company Secretary, LLB , AIII , Bsc( Maths) BHU, Certification in Insurance Risk Management ( ICSI-III) have completed Limited Insolvency Examination and having more than 20 years of experience in the field of Secretarial Practice, Project Finance, Direct Taxes ,GST, Accounts & F View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Court is required to ensure that prima facie a genuine arbitrable dispute exists NCLT cannot declare IBC, 2016 provisions/Regulations as illegal/Ultra Virus Burden lies on insurance company to prove that licence of driver was fake Directors receiving remuneration is employee under ESI Act: SC Director of Company can file defamation case for Defamatory publication: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Ram S. says:

    Why the bank club ATM & Debit Card? Secondly unnecessarily VISA is clubbed when Rupay is enough unless the customer desire it. There should not be any “”conditions apply” with “*”. This practice should be stopped and everything should be with in that paragraph for the customer to understand. Today even Net Banking in for usage of Debit card. That means swipe is not at all a condition but usage of your account for your other payments by Netbanking and physical swipe. Say if I pay my consumer bill it is also a usage. SC is very well settled the issue. Unless the first basic benefit the % addition never exists. Otherwise a blanket amount with premium based on actual usage would be the condition like that of Cash in transit policy, which is a blanket but premium adjusted as per actual cash transacted.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031