Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re SOM VCL(JV) (GST AAR Tamil Nadu)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. 10/AAR/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/03/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re SOM VCL(JV) (GST AAR Tamil Nadu)

Q1. Whether the execution of works contract service at Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project would be covered under S.No vi (or) vii of Notification No.24/2017 dated 21.09.2017 attracting GST@12% or 18%

A1. The execution of works contract service for construction of residential quarters to the employees of Kudankulam Nuclear Power Project is not covered under SI. No. 3(vi) of Notification 11/2017-CT-Rate dt. 28.06.2017 for the reasons stated in Para 7 above. The applicable rate is @18% GST as per SI. No 3(xii) of Notification 11/2017-CT-Rate dt. 28.06.2017(as amended) read with the corresponding TNGST Notification.

Q2.The assessee had already charged GST @12% on its invoices for the works contract service provided. In case the rate of GST is determined to be 18% instead of 12% should we pay the differential tax through debit note under GSTR 1?

A2. The question on how the differential tax is to be paid is found to be on the procedural aspects of payment and is out of the purview of Section 97(2) and hence is not answered.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031