Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT quashes section 147/148 proceeding as reasons to believe not existed anymore

Case Law Details

Case Name
Bansiwala Iron & Steel Rolling Mills Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2008-09
Advertisement
Bansiwala Iron & Steel Rolling Mills Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur) Since the A.O. is a quasi-judicial authority, who has to collect the evidences, material and then to adjudicate the matter after due and complete application of mind. The A.O. expected to record his own satisfaction before reaching to any conclusion. In our view, the A.O. cannot borrow his satisfaction by merely relying upon material or the result of the other reports of other investigation agency unless he himself has examined the issue in hand by due and full application of his own mind. From the facts we noticed that the A.O. so...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

Mahendra Gargieya
Qualification: LL.B / Advocate
Company: Mahendra Gargieya & Associates
Location: Jaipur, Rajasthan
Articles Published: 49

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *