Case Law Details
Case Name : Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Meenakshi Overseas Pvt Ltd (Delhi High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA 692/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 26/05/2017
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Delhi High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
In the present case, as already noticed, the reasons to believe contain not the reasons but the conclusions of the AO one after the other. There is no independent application of mind by the AO to the tangible material which forms the basis of the reasons to believe that income has escaped assessment. The conclusions of the AO are at best a reproduction of the conclusion in the investigation report. Indeed it is a ‘borrowed satisfaction’. The reasons fail to demonstrate the link between the tangible material and the formation of the reason to believe that income has escaped assessment.
Full Text of the High Court Order is as follows:-
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
It seems very infeasible to register is every state etailor make supply to, there are more than 30 states, so do etailor will register for 30 states. Seems very impractical.