Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Aircel Cellular Limited Vs DCIT (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P.No.9241 of 2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 27/04/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Aircel Cellular Limited Vs DCIT (Madras High Court)

Legal provisions involved

As per first proviso to Section 147 where assessment has already been made under Section 143(3) and assessee had disclosed truly and fully all material facts necessary for assessment then AO cannot initiate reassessment proceedings under Section 147 beyond 4 years from end of relevant A.Y. In section 147 the expression ‘true and full disclosure’ is not been defined. Madras High Court in the given judicial precedent has attempted to elaborate the circumstances in which it can be construed that there is no true and full disclosure on the part of assessee.

Principle of law laid down in case law

On account of certain information provided by assessee at the time of original assessment under Section 143(3), wrong assessment has been made and excess deduction was allowed to assessee, so as to cause loss to Revenue, then it is to be construed that assessee has not disclosed fully and truly all material facts. In that case, AO is entitled to initiate reassessment proceedings under section 147 to disallow excess deduction.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031