Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs M/s. Sattva Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 2418/Kol/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/04/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ACIT Vs M/s. Sattva Developers Pvt. Ltd. (ITAT Kolkata)

From the entry made on 06-09-2011, it would be found that the Authorised Representative filed all the details excepting the explanation regarding treatment of compensation, and for this purpose the hearing was adjourned to 13-09-2011. The next entry on 19-09-2011 inter alia reads that the Authorised Representative appeared and submitted the details asked for. In view of above, I am of the view that it is a case of change of opinion only and nothing else and I further held that a case cannot be re-open on the basis of change of opinion.

The ld. D/R could not controvert to this factual finding of the ld. CIT(A). Thus this is a clear case of change of opinion and hence the re-opening of assessment based on mistake of opinion is bad in law.

Even otherwise the re-opening is beyond the period of four years and the original assessment was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act on 08.12.2011. In the reasons recorded, there is no whisper that the assessee has failed to disclose truly and fully all material facts required for assessment. In the absence of such an allegation the re- opening is bad in law as the proviso to Section 147 comes into play.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGEMENT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031