Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tata Sky Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : MA No. 254/Mum/2020 Arising out of ITA No. 3214/Mum/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 05/01/2021
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Tata Sky Limited Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)

By virtue of this Miscellaneous Application, the assessee on a limited aspect seeks to recall the order of this Tribunal on one particular issue alone with regard to upholding the disallowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act on year end provision for expenses on the ground that while rendering the decision, this Tribunal had not followed the decision rendered by this Tribunal in the case of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., in ITA No.7382/Mum/2017 dated 19/06/2020 for the very same issue which was decided in favour of the assessee. It was pointed out by the ld. Senior Counsel for the assessee that this decision of Mahindra and Mahindra was indeed relied before the Tribunal and is also part of the record, which was not considered by this Tribunal while rendering the decision.

2. We have gone through the records and heard the submissions of both the parties and we find that the decision of Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd., is already on record vide order dated 19/06/2020 for A.Yrs 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14.

3. We find that this Tribunal while disposing off the appeal in ITA No.3214/Mum/2014 for A.Y.2009-10 dated 10/09/2020 in para 14 & 15 of its order had rejected the contentions of the assessee and upheld the disallowance made u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act. But we find that a contrary view has already been taken by this Tribunal in the case of Mahindra and Mahindra vide its order dated 19/06/2020. Non-following of the said order constitute mistake apparent on record within the meaning of Section 254(2) of the Act. Hence, in order to maintain judicial consistency, we deem it fit and appropriate to modify para 15 of our order dated 10/09/2020 in the case of the assessee before us as under:-

“15. We find that the issue in dispute has already been addressed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd., in ITA No.7382/Mum/2017 dated 19/06/2020 wherein the very same issue had been disposed off as under:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031