This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Once quantum addition deleted, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) has no legs to stand
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Thermax Limited. (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2009-2010
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Thermax Limited (ITAT Pune)
Revenue has not doubted the genuinity of the return filed by the assessee and has not said that the particular of expenses claimed in the return were not correct. The expenses were claimed and quantum additions have been upheld by the Tribunal. However, in the separate proceedings of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act when the Revenue has accepted the return of the assessee and has not brought on record any material to show that whatever stated in the return is incorrect or inaccurate, in such scenario, there is no question of imposing penalty...






