Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Once quantum addition deleted, penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) has no legs to stand

Case Law Details

Case Name
ACIT Vs Thermax Limited. (ITAT Pune)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2009-2010
Advertisement ACIT Vs Thermax Limited (ITAT Pune) Revenue has not doubted the genuinity of the return filed by the assessee and has not said that the particular of expenses claimed in the return were not correct. The expenses were claimed and quantum additions have been upheld by the Tribunal. However, in the separate proceedings of penalty u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act when the Revenue has accepted the return of the assessee and has not brought on record any material to show that whatever stated in the return is incorrect or inaccurate, in such scenario, there is no question of imposing penalty...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *