This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Addition u/s 69 not sustainable in absence of any proof of investment by assesse: HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- CIT Vs Provestment Securities Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Brief of the Case
Delhi High Court held In the case of CIT vs. Provestment Securities Pvt. Ltd. that we are inclined to agree with the Tribunal that the question whether an investment had been made or not is a matter of fact and the same cannot be presumed. In the present case, it is probable that either the Assesses or any other person related to the assesses would have paid for acquiring the vehicle in question. An investigation into the sources of the funds may perhaps have established a link between the funds used for the purchase of the vehicle and the Assesses. However, no such link has...
