Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITC Vs Nestle India Limited (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITC Vs Nestle India Limited (Madras High Court) The dispute between the ITC (Plaintiff) and the Nestle India Limited 9 defendant)  in the present suit arises on account of adoption of the expression ‘Magical Masala’ by the defendant for marketing its instant noodles viz.’ Maggixtra -delicious Magical Masala’ in 2013. The plaintiff had earlier introduced Sunfeast Yippee! noodles in two varieties, namely, “Classic Masala” and “Magic Masala” in 2010. The word “Magic” is laudatory. It is incapable of being appropriated by the plaintiff. As such no person can claim any monopoly...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031