Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Ferromatic Milacron India Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Ferromatic Milacron India Pvt Ltd (Gujarat High Court) We may recall the Assessing Officer does not dispute that the expenditure was capital in nature since by making such expenditure, the assessee had acquired certain enduring benefits. He was, however, of the opinion that to claim depreciation, the assessee must satisfy the requirement of section 32(1)(ii)  of the Act, in which, Explanation 3 provides that for the purpose of the said sub-section the expression “assets” would mean [as per clause (b)] intangible assets, being know- how, patents, copyrights, trade marks, licenses, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930