Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s. Essel Propack Ltd. (Bombay High Court at Goa)
Appeal Number : Excise appeal No. 4 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/02/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Urvashi Porwal

Urvashi PorwalBrief of the Case

In the case of CCE V/s M/s. Essel Propack Ltd. it was held that Rule 9 is a procedural aspect which cannot deny the claim of the respondents to avail of such CENVAT Credit which they are, otherwise, admittedly, entitled to and hence CENVAT credit is allowed on the basis of TR-6 challan.

Brief Facts

In the present case, the assessee during the period prior to 16/06/2005 has availed CENVAT credit on the basis of TR6 Challan. The Revenue disallowed the same by alleging that TR-6 challan is not the document prescribed under Rule 9 of the CENVAT Rules and hence CENVAT credit should be disallowed. The CESTAT allowed the CENVAT credit to the assessee. On being aggrieved by the said order, the Revenue preferred the present appeal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031