Case Law Details
Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs M/s. Essel Propack Ltd. (Bombay High Court at Goa)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Bombay High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Urvashi Porwal
Brief of the Case
In the case of CCE V/s M/s. Essel Propack Ltd. it was held that Rule 9 is a procedural aspect which cannot deny the claim of the respondents to avail of such CENVAT Credit which they are, otherwise, admittedly, entitled to and hence CENVAT credit is allowed on the basis of TR-6 challan.
Brief Facts
In the present case, the assessee during the period prior to 16/06/2005 has availed CENVAT credit on the basis of TR6 Challan. The Revenue disallowed the same by alleging that TR-6 challan is not the document prescribed under Rule 9 of the CENVAT Rules and hence C...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

