Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs. Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala (ACMM)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts : District Court
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO vs. Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala (ACMM) t is well established that accused committed alleged offence. Before authority, he also remain absent. Not any application for compounding the offence is filed. It appears that there is culpable mental state of the accused for non depositing of TDS amount within time therefore, he is liable for punishment. The offence U/sec. 276B of Income ­Tax Act 1961 is punishable with rigorous imprisonment which shall not be less than three months and which may extend to 7 years and with fine. The matter is on record not substantiate the contention of accused th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031