Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs. Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala (ACMM)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts : District Court
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

ITO vs. Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala (ACMM)

t is well established that accused committed alleged offence. Before authority, he also remain absent. Not any application for compounding the offence is filed. It appears that there is culpable mental state of the accused for non depositing of TDS amount within time therefore, he is liable for punishment. The offence U/sec. 276B of Income ­Tax Act 1961 is punishable with rigorous imprisonment which shall not be less than three months and which may extend to 7

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31