Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO vs. Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala (ACMM)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Courts : District Court
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO vs. Firoz Abdul Gafar Nadiadwala (ACMM) t is well established that accused committed alleged offence. Before authority, he also remain absent. Not any application for compounding the offence is filed. It appears that there is culpable mental state of the accused for non depositing of TDS amount within time therefore, he is liable for punishment. The offence U/sec. 276B of Income ­Tax Act 1961 is punishable with rigorous imprisonment which shall not be less than three months and which may extend to 7 years and with fine. The matter is on record not substantiate the contention of accused th...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Tags:

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031