Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Dayamayee Marble & Granite (ITAT kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Dayamayee Marble & Granite (ITAT kolkata) Where assessee received capital from the partner in cash, it did not tentamount to loan or deposit and therefore, penalty under section 271D was not to be levied for violation of section 269SS. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT 1. This appeal of the revenue arises out of the order for the Asst Year 2009-10 of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-6, Kolkata [in short the Ld. ITA] in Appeal No. 208/CIT(A)-6/Kol/15-16 dated 02.11.2016 against the order passed by the J.C.I.T- Range-24, Hooghly [ in short the ld AO] under section 271D of...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930