Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Waheeda Asif Abbas Vs The Income Tax Officer (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.3354/Chny/2016
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/12/18
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Smt. Waheeda Asif Abbas Vs The ITO (ITAT Chennai)

The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim of the assessee under Section 54F of the Act on the ground that the assessee’s husband was not having any share in the property sold by the assessee. Since the investment was made in the name of the assessee and her husband, the Assessing Officer restricted the investment to the extent 50%. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that under the common law, assessee and her husband are one and same. Therefore, when the investment was made in the name of the assessee and her husband, it has to be considered that investment was made by the assessee. In a male dominating society, investment made in the name of the husband is also to be considered as investment. While adjudicating the issue arises for consideration, the prevailing customary practice in the society cannot be ignored by the judicial authorities. Therefore, even though the property sold stands in the name of assessee alone and the investment was admittedly made in the name of assessee and her husband, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the object of enactment to promote housing facility in the country is achieved and the assessee’s husband cannot be considered as a third party as far as the assessee’s investment is concerned. Therefore, this Tribunal is of the considered opinion that the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 54F of the Act even though the investment was said to be made in the joint name of assessee and her husband. Therefore, we are unable to uphold the orders of the authorities below. Accordingly, the orders of both the authorities below are set aside and the Assessing Officer is directed to grant exemption under Section 54F of the Act.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT

This appeal of the assessee is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Chennai, dated 20.10.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13.

2. The first issue arises for consideration is with regard to assessment of capital gain of the minors in the hands of the assessee.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031