Case Law Details
M/s. Chavva Estates Private Vs Wealth Tax Officer (ITAT Hyderabad)
We find that as long as the assessee owns the commercial asset, which is capable of being put to productive use, the said commercial asset is not exigible to Wealth Tax. In this case, the assessee along with two other companies owns the theatre but could not run the theatre due to various reasons but that does not mean that the property has lost its character. Hence, we are satisfied that it is in the nature of commercial establishment, and the exclusion provided in section 2(ea)(i)(3) would be applicable.
FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT
Both are Revenue’s appeals for the A.Y 2007-08 and 2008-09 against the order of the CIT (A)- 1, Hyderabad, dated 9.6.20 17. The Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeal:
“ 1. Learned CIT (A) erred on both facts and law of the case.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
