Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Reimbursement of loss to Subsidiary Companies in the course of business is allowable

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2019 taxguru.in 4
Case Name
Mafatlal Industries Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2002-03
Advertisement


Mafatlal Industries Limited Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

Loss on Account of Compensation on Enforcement of Security Paid to Subsidiary Companies is allowable as same was in the course of business

The assessee has claimed loss incurred by two subsidiary companies M/s Mishapar Investment Ltd & Vibhadeep Investment & Trading Ltd on the ground that the said loss has been incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with its business for borrowing loan from ILFS. The AO disallowed loss claimed by the assessee on account of compensation paid to two subsidiary companies on the ground that the said loss is in the nature of capital expenditure which is incurred in connection with repayment of loan borrowed from two subsidiaries, therefore, the said loss cannot be allowed as expenditure. The AO has analysed the facts in the light of evidences filed by the assessee to come to the conclusion that the said expenditure is not incurred wholly and exclusively in connection with the business, therefore, merely for the reason that there is a contractual obligation between the parties, compensation paid to reimburse loss incurred by two subsidiaries on account of enforcement of security cannot be allowed as deduction. The AO has not disputed the fact that the assessee has incurred loss on account of enforcement of security by ILFS. In fact, M/s ILFS has sold shares belonging to two subsidiary companies and recovered loss of Rs.12,60,000 and Rs.1,58,40,000. It is also an admitted fact that there is a contractual obligation in terms of agreement between the parties that in case any loss incurred on account of enforcement of security by the lender for non repayment of loans, then such loss shall be indemnified and reimbursed to two subsidiary companies. These facts are not disputed by the lower authorities. The AO is only on the point that the said expenditure is a capital expenditure because it arises out of a loan transaction between the assessee and the bank and the assessaee has reimbursed loss incurred by subsidiary companies in the process of enforcement of security being shares pledged with the lender.

Paid content

Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.

Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.