Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-2009
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
 M/s. Orison Transport Vs DCIT (ITAT Cuttack) Belief of the assessee that return of advance from customers is not prohibited by section 269T was a bonafide belief. Therefore, the levy of penalty u/s.271E of the Act of Rs.21,49,943/- cannot be sustained. FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT JUDGMENT This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the CIT(A)-2, Bhubaneswar dated 29.3.2017 for the assessment year 2008-2009. 2. The sole issue involved in this appeal is that the CIT(A) erred in confirming the levy of penalty of Rs.21,49,943/- u/s.271E of the Act. 3. According to the Assessing Offic...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930