Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Sunil Kumar Goel (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : I.T.A. No. 777 of 2008, I.T.A. No. 778 of 2008
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/03/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

There is no dispute about the fact, that the instant cash transactions of the respondent-assessee were with the sister concern, and that, these transactions were between the family, and due to business exigency. A family transaction, between two independent assessees, based on an act of casualness, specially in a case where the disclosure thereof is contained in the compilation of accounts, and which has no tax effect, in our view establishes “reasonable cause” under Section 273B of the Act. Since the respondent- assessee, had satisfactorily established “reasonable cause” under Section 273B of the Act, he must be deemed to have established sufficient cause for not invoking the penal provisions (Sections 271D and 271E of the Act) against him.

HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH

I.T.A. No. 777 of 2008, I.T.A. No. 778 of 2008

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Faridabad

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031