Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s Goldstar Jewellery Limited Vs Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : 6570 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 14/01/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Manish Soni

CA Manish SoniContext: The amendment made by Finance Act 2012 (‘FA 2012’) by way of explanation to Sec. 92B w.r.e.f. 1 April 2002 included many transactions in the definition of international transaction for Transfer Pricing (‘TP’) purpose. In this case, the ITAT ruled that extended credit period allowed to the Associated Enterprises (‘AE’) amounted to short term funding without interest and thus attracted TP adjustment on account of notional interest from such short term funding. TPO made adjustment considering interest rate @18.816% but DRP reduced it to 7%.

In this case, the average collection period from different debtors of assessee was as under:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031