This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
In case of conflict in judgment of non-jurisdictional High Courts, one in favour of assessee should be adopted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Solapur Siddheshwar Sahakari Bank Ltd (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
The assessee is a non-scheduled Co-operative Bank carrying on banking business in terms of a license issued by Reserve Bank of India (RBI), and is thus governed by Circulars of RBI relating to Prudential Norms, Income Recognition, Asset Classification, Provisioning and other related matters. In terms of such Prudential Norms of RBI, assessee did not account for interest relating to Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) i.e. advances to customers which were classified as NPAs in terms of the RBI guidelines. The Assessing Officer was of the opinion that interest income even in relation to such NPAs was l...
right view. always accused gets benefit .accused till proved of his guilt by prosecutor, naturally accused is innocent is criminal jurisprudence same applicable even in civil issues, tax matters are just civil issues only, wherever actus rea or mens rea not proved then accused is safe, if prosecutor loses the matter, naturally the accused can move damages suits for liquidated damages on so many counts.