This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere Material found during survey not gives any authorization to AO to make assessment U/s. 153C & 153A unless the same evidences Income understatement
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Supraja’s Sandy Lane Bar & Restaurant Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2007-08
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Visakhapatnam
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Supraja’s Sandy Lane Bar & Restaurant Vs. ACIT (ITAT Visakhapatnam)
As per 153C of Income Tax Act for invoking jurisdiction, there must be incriminating material found and seized during the course of search in form of money, bullion, jewellery or the evidences indicating the inflation of e expenditure or undisclosed investments or suppression of Income.etc. As per the satisfaction note, the notice under section 153C was issued basing on the material found and seized during the search in the residential premises of A.T. Rayudu and Group bearing No. ATR/B/21 page No. 27-31. On verification...
