Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajan Chopra, jalandhar Vs. DCIT (ITAT Amritsar)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07
CA Vinamar Gupta Facts of the case: A partnership firm purchased property from NRI but failed to deduct TDS u/s 195. The ADIT (International Taxation) raised demand comprising tax and interest by issuing notice to one of the partners of the firm in his individual capacity. CIT A held against the assesse. The moot question before ITAT Amritsar in Sh. Rajan Chopra ITA 415/ASR/2016 pronounced on 28-03-2017 was whether service of notice to the partner in his individual capacity who signed sale deed on behalf of the firm was a valid notice? Decision : The ITAT Amritsar weighed following legal cons...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. vswami says:

    Offhand
    For an academic purpose, and as a matter of general interest, may be worthwhile giving thoughts to the likely consequences, in a situation in which the partnership is a LLP; or a one man company or an ‘unregistered’ Firm for tax purposes !

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031