This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Condonation of Delay for gross negligence, inaction and laches
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Shri Kunal Surana, Vs The ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2006-07
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITAT MUMBAI BENCHES “A”, MUMBAI
ITA No.: 3297/Mum/2012
Assessment Year: 2006-07
Shri Kunal Surana, vs. The ITO
Date of hearing : 14.03.2013
Date of pronouncement : 19.04.2013
Summary of the Case Law
Out of the reasons given by the appellant for condonation of delay, it is to be looked into whether the appellant had acted with reasonable diligence in prosecuting his appeal and whether he was prevented by sufficient cause for not filing his appeal within the period of limitation as prescribed by law. We may observe that the explanation put forth by the learned AR does not ...
Can somebody throw some light on the following matter:
The District Consumer Court had condoned the delay in filing the petition and the Plaintiff paid the cost to the court. Thereafter, the matter went to State Consumer Court, which overuled the condonation granted by the District Forum.
Is there any case law which says that the condonation granted cannot be overruled or reversed.?