Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Rakesh Dungarmal Tainwala Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.3221/Mum/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 19/06/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

 

Learned counsel for the assessee fairly submitted that identical issue has come up in the case of Ramesh D. Tainwala in ITA No. 3853/Mum/2010 wherein the ITAT “D” Bench Mumbai concluded that provisions of section 28(va)(a) would apply and consequently the amount received by that assessee would be chargeable to tax as business income and not under the head capital gains. The learned counsel for the assessee admitted that despite the case of the assessee that non-compete fees is assessable to tax under the head ‘Long Term Capital Gains’, in the light of the aforesaid decision the issue stands covered against the assessee.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI

ITA No.3221/Mum/2011 – (Assessment Year: 2007-08)

Shri Rakesh Dungarmal Tainwala Vs.  DCIT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031