Shri Suresh Kumar D. Shah Vs. DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)- It is held that in a Joint Development Agreement if the Developer has performed or is willing to perform his part of the contract, then the transaction would qualify as a ‘transfer’ under section 2(47)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The fundamental feature which determines the taxability of capital gains is that the gain ought to be from the transfer of a capital asset. This section has a larger scope of operation as it states that the gain shall be deemed income of that previous year in which the transfer takes place. Accordingly, given the deeming provision, the income on account of capital gain should be charged to tax in the same previous year in which the transfer was effected or deemed to have taken place. The doctrine of ‘part performance’ is undoubtedly based upon the doctrine of equity. If one party has performed his part of duty then equity demands that the other party shall also perform his part of the obligation. Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act requires the existence of following conditions:
- Existence of a contract;
- The contract is in respect of a transfer and not for any other purpose;
- Existence of consideration; and
- Terms necessary to constitute the transfer should be ascertained with reasonable certainty.
The terms which require certainty consists mainly of a) passing of substantial consideration and b) passing over of possession.
Paid content
Become a Basic or Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Basic or Premium member.





