This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Even prior to assessment year 2008-09, when rule 8D was not applicable, the AO had to enforce the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 14A
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- LIC Housing Finance Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2001- 02
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
LIC Housing Finance Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)-
Issue 1 – Whether where all the facts regarding the amount written off for non-convertible debentures are considered by the AO in the original assessment, reassessment proceedings cannot be initiated by issuing notice u/s 148 merely on change of opinion-?
Hon’ble jurisdictional High Court in the case of Asian Paints Ltd. Vs. DCIT and Others, 308 ITR 195 has held that issuance of notice u/s 148 of the Act for the reason that some material which was available on record while making assessment was inadvertently excluded from consideration amo...





