Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Starlite (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2279/Mum/06
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/04/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2002- 2003
Sponsored

ORDER

PER J. SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM :-

These are cross’ appeals directed against the order of learned CIT(A)-XVII, Mumbai dated 23.1.2006 for A.Y. 2002-03.

2. Facts in brief :

The assessee is a partnership firm and in the business of import, manufacture and export of diamonds and Jewellery. During the year, the assessee has shown export sale of polished diamonds and claimed deduction u/s. 80HHC. The assessee also filed an Audit Report in the Form No. 3CEB. The Assessing Officer referred the case to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for determination of Arms Length Price (ALP) u/s. 92CA(3). TPO vide her order dated 9.3.2005 brought out the fact at paragraph 3&4 of her order, which is extracted for ready references :-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031