Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Avinash M Baliga & Others Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year :
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
CA Urvashi Porwal Brief of the Case In the case of M/s. Balajee Perfumes Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, it was held that in order to prove clandestine removal of excisable goods, the department should take reasonable steps and provide correlated corroborative evidence to prove that the assessee has made cladenstine removal of goods. Further, it was also held that the statements of the various parties should be considered in an holistic manner in order to prove the intent of the assessee in regards to clandestine removal. Facts of the Case The facts of the case are that on intelligence ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031