Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Avinash M Baliga & Others Vs Commissioner of Central Excise (CESTAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 1441-1444 of 2008, FINAL ORDER NO. 50025-50028 /2016-EX(DB)
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/01/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CA Urvashi Porwal

Urvashi Porwal

Brief of the Case

In the case of M/s. Balajee Perfumes Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, it was held that in order to prove clandestine removal of excisable goods, the department should take reasonable steps and provide correlated corroborative evidence to prove that the assessee has made cladenstine removal of goods. Further, it was also held that the statements of the various parties should be considered in an holistic manner in order to prove the intent of the assessee in regards to clandestine removal.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031