Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vodafone Essar Limited Vs. DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 6058, 6059, 6060/Mum/2009)
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/12/2010
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 08/2008- 09 and 2009- 10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

It was held that the payment of National roaming charges is not rent for the use of telecom equipments in accordance with Section 194-I of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (the Act) and accordingly not liable for deduction of tax at source.

Facts of the case

• The taxpayer is a Public Limited Company engaged in the business of providing mobile telephone services. The taxpayer entered into an agreement with IDEA Cellular Ltd. (IDEA) whereby a subscriber of a cellular network can also gain access to the services of any other network operators in their respective licensed area for a specific charge called as national roaming charge.

• The Assessing Officer (AO) noticed that the taxpayer had failed to deduct tax at source on payments made to other mobile service providers towards national roaming charge.

• The AO was of the view that payment of national roaming charge made to other cellular service providers for allowing use of their network would amount to payment made for technical services within the meaning of section 1 94J of the Act and the taxpayer should have deducted tax from such payments.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031