This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Section 44AD Cannot Apply as Turnover Exceeded Prescribed ₹2 Crore Limit: ITAT Kolkata
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Jitanshu Goswami Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Jitanshu Goswami Vs ITO (ITAT Kolkata)
Summary: The ITAT Kolkata partly allowed the assessee’s appeal concerning estimation of business income for AY 2017-18 arising from trading in agricultural products. The Assessing Officer had rejected the declared net profit of 1.297% on turnover of ₹3.50 crore after the assessee failed to produce books of account and cash book, and estimated income at 8% of turnover, resulting in an addition of ₹23.50 lakh. The CIT(A) upheld the addition by invoking Section 44AD presumptive taxation provisions. However, the Tribunal held that Sect...






