This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Anti-Profiteering Allegations Rejected Because Entire Works Contract Was Executed After GST Implementation
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- DG Anti Profiteering Vs Belhekar & Kale Associates (GSTAT)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
DG Anti Profiteering Vs Belhekar & Kale Associates (GSTAT)
Summary: The GST Appellate Tribunal considered proceedings arising from an application filed by Mumbai Port Trust Authority under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging violation of Section 171 of the CGST Act by Belhekar & Kale Associates in relation to a works contract for modernization of MICT. The Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering referred the matter to the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) for investigation. In its report dated 21.01.2026, the DGAP concluded that the case did not involve constructio...






