Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Purushottam Bhadra Vs ITO Ward-20(2)(1) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Purushottam Bhadra Vs ITO Ward-20(2)(1) (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT quashes reassessment for AY 2015-16 – AO’s “artificial inflation” of escaped income held legally unsustainable In a major relief to the assessee, the Mumbai ITAT quashed the entire reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 after holding that the notice issued u/s 148 dated 18.04.2022 for AY 2015-16 was time-barred, based on incorrect facts, and issued without proper jurisdiction. The reopening was triggered on the basis of information available on the Insight Portal alleging that the assessee had purchased imm...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bangalore ITAT Upholds Section 11 Exemption Despite Alleged Capitation Fee Collections Bangalore ITAT Allows Mine Development Expenditure as Revenue Expense; Deletes Double Addition ITAT Allows Exemption for BSNL VRS Compensation and Leave Encashment ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition; Cash Redeposit from Earlier Property Sale Accepted Entire Sales Receipts Cannot Be Taxed Under Section 69A: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930