This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Remands Case as CIT(A) Admitted C-Forms Without Following Rule 46A(3)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ITO Vs Durga Saw Mill (ITAT Raipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2017-18
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Raipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ITO Vs Durga Saw Mill (ITAT Raipur)
C-Forms as Additional Evidence Require AO Verification Under Rule 46A(3); Relief Granted on Basis of Additional Evidence Set Aside Due to Non-Compliance with Rule 46A; ITAT Says Additional Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Accepted Without Giving AO Opportunity; Bogus Entry Dispute Sent Back Because C-Forms Were Not Examined by Assessing Officer.
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Raipur Bench allowed the Revenue’s appeal for statistical purposes and remanded the matter to the CIT(A)/NFAC after holding that Rule 46A(3) of...




