This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
ITAT Mumbai: Section 270A Penalty Quashed – Vague Notice Without Specific Charge Invalid
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Monisha Ravi Jaising Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2022-23
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Mumbai
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Monisha Ravi Jaising Vs ACIT (ITAT Mumbai)
ITAT Mumbai: Section 270A Penalty Quashed – Vague Notice Without Specific Charge Invalid
In this case, the ITAT Mumbai deleted a hefty penalty of ₹3.22 crore levied u/s 270A on alleged under-reporting/misreporting of LTCG arising from sale of property.
The Tribunal did not go into merits of capital gains taxability and instead decided the case on a fundamental legal defect—the penalty notice and order failed to specify the exact limb of “misreporting” under Section 270A(9).
It was observed that:
Section 270A(9) provides specific categories ...




