Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Patil Construction and Infrastructure Limited (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2022-23
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Patil Construction and Infrastructure Limited (ITAT Pune) Security Deposits from Contractors Not Cash Credits: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹22.61 Cr Addition The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Pune Bench, in ACIT vs Patil Construction and Infrastructure Ltd., upheld deletion of ₹22.61 crore added under Section 68, holding that security deposits/retention money from contractors are genuine trade liabilities and not unexplained cash credits. The Assessing Officer treated deposits from contractors as non-genuine and taxed ₹22.61 crore as unexplained income, alleging lack of identity, c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mere Acceptance of Political Donation Addition Doesn’t Justify Penalty ITAT Allows Full ₹10.15 Lakh Leave Encashment Exemption: ₹25 Lakh CBDT Limit Held Applicable ITAT Deletes Additions Based Solely on Third-Party Seized Tally Data Loans via Banking Channels not Bogus Merely on ‘Shell Company’ Allegation Wrong TAN in Typing Cannot Deny Genuine TDS Credit: ITAT Ahmedabad View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031