Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prateek Rahul Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Prateek Rahul Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹16.61 lakh made u/s 69C towards alleged unexplained credit card payments. The Tribunal observed: The case was reopened based on AIR information of high credit card usage The assessee explained that the card was used by relatives and associated entities, who directly made payments Detailed documentary evidence was furnished, including: Confirmations Bank statements ITRs and financials of contributors Affidavits supporting transactions The ITAT held: The assessee had fully explained the source of payments Paymen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930