Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharath Bail Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bharath Bail Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee arranged borrowings of ₹1.77 crore for a company, where funds were directly advanced by lenders to the company and interest was also paid directly by the company to the lenders. However, TDS on interest (₹2.04 lakh) was deducted in the assessee’s name, and he offered the gross interest income (₹20.49 lakh) to tax while claiming equal deduction under Section 57. The AO disallowed the deduction due to lack of proof of actual interest payment by the assessee, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The ITAT observed that the assessee merely acted...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930