Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bharath Bail Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Bharath Bail Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) The assessee arranged borrowings of ₹1.77 crore for a company, where funds were directly advanced by lenders to the company and interest was also paid directly by the company to the lenders. However, TDS on interest (₹2.04 lakh) was deducted in the assessee’s name, and he offered the gross interest income (₹20.49 lakh) to tax while claiming equal deduction under Section 57. The AO disallowed the deduction due to lack of proof of actual interest payment by the assessee, which was upheld by the CIT(A). The ITAT observed that the assessee merely acted...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Restores Section 80P Deduction Claim of Agricultural Credit Co-op Society Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031