Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jignesh Manojkumar Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Jignesh Manojkumar Shah Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained The AO made an addition of ₹3.80 lakh u/s 68 treating cash introduced into capital account as unexplained, despite the assessee explaining it as coming from past savings and loans. The ITAT noted that: The assessee had sufficient past income and cash availability reflected in earlier balance sheet, He had been earning income for over two decades, and The amount involved was relatively small compared to declared income (₹1.38 crore). The Tribunal held that in such c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031