Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bennur Siddegowda Santhosh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Bennur Siddegowda Santhosh Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce In, the ITAT Bangalore held that Rule 7B (specific provision for coffee) prevails over Rule 7 (general provision) for computing income from coffee cultivation and processing. The assessee, a coffee grower and curer, claimed entire income as agricultural. However, the AO applied Rule 7B(1A) and treated 40% of income as business income, leading to addition. The assessee argued that Rule 7 should apply and also contended that part of coffee wa...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Defect in Section 143(2) Notice Format Is Curable Under Section 292B: ITAT Bangalore Cash Loan Enforceable Under NI Act Despite Section 269SS Breach: SC Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031