Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Investor Funds of Company Cannot Be Taxed as Director’s Personal Unexplained Money u/s 69A

Case Law Details

Case Name
Jagmohan Singh Bedi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2015-16
Advertisement Jagmohan Singh Bedi Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) The Assessing Officer made an addition of ₹59.18 crore under section 69A in the hands of the assessee, alleging that amounts received from hundreds of investors in the name of a real estate group company (M/s IFAMA Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd.) represented unexplained money of the assessee. The same addition was made protectively for AYs 2015-16 and 2016-17 and substantively for AY 2017-18, effectively taxing the same alleged amount across multiple years. The assessee contended that he was merely a low-paid employee of the group...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,940

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *